In keeping with his long-standing interest in Tibet, he argues that Chinese claims to the region - claims he suggests lack historical grounding - lie at the heart of Beijing's stance vis-à-vis the disputed boundary. "To my mind, what has happened on the Indian frontier since the occupation of Tibet might to some extent be regarded as a judgement on India for admitting, after some verbal protests, that Tibet was really an integral part of China, which it has never been in history at all" (p. 240). Published by London: Royal Central Asian Society, 1963